We use cookies to give you the best possible service. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies. I agree.
X
de | en
  • Shop
  • Grower's book
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • ABC
FON +49 9543 8414-12
office@luberaedibles.com
Subscribe to gardener's letter

Our newsletter for the gardening professional

Unsubscribe is possible at any time.

Thank you for your interest in the newsletter!

To ensure our newsletter reaches the right recipient, we sent an e-mail to the address provided.

Please confirm by clicking on the link contained therein again that you subscribe to the gardener's letter at this address.

Seen posts
Frederik Vollert

In vitro propagation as a modern solution in young plant production

Kulturgefäße Labor, Skalpell, sterile WerkbankIn vitro propagation is a regular topic of discussion in horticulture. Whilst it is an important component of reliable, high-quality young plant production for many businesses, others view it rather critically. Particularly in the organic sector and in European fruit growing, there are recurring reservations about this propagation method.

A closer look, however, reveals that in vitro propagation cannot be assessed in general terms. As with any propagation method, the results depend on the specific crop, the production objectives and the techniques employed. In this article, we demonstrate how we can use tissue culture to produce uniform, healthy and high-quality young plants almost all year round.

Summary

In vitro propagation enables the year-round production of healthy, true-to-type and uniform young plants whilst minimising the need for mother plants. High plant quality is ensured through controlled laboratory conditions and regular health checks.

Key advantages include high phytosanitary safety, good predictability and the ability to scale up production easily. Disadvantages include high investment costs, a need for highly skilled staff and long development times for difficult crops.

How quickly a crop can be scaled up depends heavily on the plant species: whilst raspberry production can be ramped up to over 100,000 young plants within around five years, more demanding crops such as red currants require significantly longer development times. The decisive factor is therefore not so much the method itself as the manageability of the crop in question.

Tissue culture process

To gain a better understanding of in vitro propagation, it is worth taking a look at the individual production steps. Each step contributes to ultimately producing healthy, true-to-type and high-performing young plants. 

The raspberry serves as an example. This is because, more than 35 years ago, the raspberry was the first fruit-bearing plant species that we propagated in vitro. Today, it still accounts for around 50 per cent of all young plants produced by Lubera Edibles.

The mother plant

A key advantage of in vitro propagation is the low requirement for mother plants. Compared with other vegetative propagation methods, in vitro propagation requires only a small number of source plants to produce large quantities of young plants.

Mutterpflanzen, Sortensichtung; LE, Edibles, Strullendorf

Picture: Mother plants for assessment and testing for true-to-type in Strullendorf

This enables us to provide intensive care for each mother plant and to safeguard its phytosanitary status through regular testing for key fungal, bacterial and viral pathogens. The mother plants are selected from Lubera’s breeding and selection fields in Switzerland. After being transferred to Strullendorf, Germany, the plants are tested and undergo additional pomological assessments to ensure long-term varietal purity. 

The sister plant

A small number of so-called sister plants are established from the mother plants using root cuttings. These are intended solely to provide plant material as young as possible for the establishment of new in vitro cultures.
For this purpose, the plants are forced in early spring under controlled greenhouse conditions. The original mother plants are retained for further monitoring and variety testing.

In Vitro, Startkulturen, Mutterpflanzen, Schwesterpflanzen

Picture: Sister plants used to obtain starting material for establishing in vitro propagation

Establishment of in vitro cultures

For raspberries, the meristems of fresh spring shoots are generally used for establishment. The young shoots are cut into individual nodes in the laboratory and then sterilised. This is necessary because a successful in vitro culture requires completely germ-free plant material. Even minor contamination by fungi or bacteria can jeopardise entire culture setups.

Removal of adhering fungi and bacteria by sterilisation

Choosing the concentration and exposure time of the sterilising solution is always a balancing act. On the one hand, microorganisms must be reliably removed; on the other hand, the sensitive plant tissue must not be damaged.

Sodium hypochlorite is usually used as a disinfectant. After treatment, the plant material is rinsed thoroughly to ensure no residues remain that could impair sprouting or further development.

in vitro Vermehrung, Sterilisation, Rhabarber, Lubera Edibles

Picture: Sterilisation process – shown here using rhubarb as an example

Whole nodes or prepared axillary buds?

Either whole nodes or prepared axillary buds can be used for establishment. The method chosen depends on the specific variety and previous experience. During preparation, the outer layers of tissue are removed under a microscope to expose the meristem. 

Regular monitoring of the new starter cultures ensures that any potential infections are detected and isolated early. Otherwise, this could lead to total failure.

Nutrient medium for growth and propagation

The culture medium supplies the plants with all the necessary nutrients, vitamins and minerals. Since the young plants in the culture vessel can only perform photosynthesis to a limited extent, sugar is added as an additional energy source.
Growth regulators promote cell division and the development of new shoots. By regularly dividing and repotting the cultures, the plant material can be propagated in a targeted and controlled manner.

Scaled-up production

Once the plants have been successfully established, the actual production planning begins. The starting point is the desired delivery date. Based on the culture-specific propagation cycles, planning is carried out backwards to determine when and in what quantities in vitro material is required. This allows production capacities and delivery dates to be managed reliably.

in vitro, labor, meristemvermehrung, impfbank

Picture: In-vitro plant propagation

Rooting phase

For most crops, rooting takes place in two stages. First, the plants are placed on a special medium that stimulates root formation. However, for most crops, actual root formation and development occur directly in the substrate. For this purpose, the plants are transferred to sterile substrate trays. Special plastic films ensure high humidity while simultaneously allowing controlled air exchange. Depending on the crop, this phase lasts between three and ten weeks. Wo 3 und wo 10 wochen?

in vitro Vermehrung, in vitro Plug, IVP, Himbeeren

Picture: In-vitro trays during the rooting phase

Hardening-off phase

Once rooting is complete, the plants are gradually acclimatised to greenhouse conditions. To do this, the protective films are removed bit by bit. By removing the individual plastic films at staggered intervals, the initially still-tender cell tissue of the leaves can gradually harden until the leaf structure becomes robust enough for the plants to cope well with the greenhouse climate. In some cases, this very final step already takes place in the final young plant tray.

in vitro Vermehrung, in vitro Plug, IVP, Himbeeren

Picture: In-vitro tray with just one layer of film remaining; the first layer of film has already been removed to allow for better air exchange

Advantages of in vitro culture

-    Low demand for mother plants
-    Year-round production planning possible – independent of seasonal propagation windows
-    High varietal purity through controlled mother plant stocks
-    Consistent plant quality and homogeneous stocks
-    Good scalability as demand increases
-    High phytosanitary status through regular checks and tests

Disadvantages of in vitro culture

-    High investment in laboratory and climate control equipment
-    Highly qualified staff required
-    In some cases, long lead times until new cultures are ready for production
-    Not every plant species or variety can be propagated equally well

How fast is in vitro culture?

How quickly a new variety can be transferred to production via in vitro culture depends heavily on the plant species and variety. Some crops can be reliably scaled up within a few years, whilst others require significantly longer development and optimisation phases.

For this reason, the speed of in vitro propagation cannot be compared directly with other vegetative propagation methods.

Timeline for a simple crop – using the raspberry as an example (fast and reliable)

Raspberries are one of the most established crops at our company. Thanks to decades of experience and short propagation cycles, production can be scaled up relatively quickly.

Year of development Individual steps
Year 0 Selection of the mother plant(s)
Year 1
  • Separation of the mother plants
  • Phytosanitary testing
  • Establishment of in vitro culture
Year 2
  • Spring: Test rooting of the first 100 young plants
  • Summer: Test rooting of 1,000 young plants to assess scalability for the first time
Year 3 Confirmation of scalability: with up to 10,000 young plants
Year 4 Up to 100,000 young plants, subject to confirmed scalability
Year 5 > 100,000 young plants

 

Timeline for challenging crops – using red currants as an example (slow and untested)

Red currants demonstrate that not every crop responds equally well to in vitro propagation. In this case, several years of development work were required to establish stable and reproducible protocols.

Development work on red currants is not yet complete. However, we are optimistic about the future and expect to achieve predictable and scalable young plant production in the medium term.

Year of development Individual steps
Year 0 Selection of the mother plant(s)
Year 1 Separation of the mother plants
Phytosanitary testing
Establishment of in vitro culture
Year 2 Testing of existing protocols
Adaptation of the protocols
Test rooting of the first 100 young plants
Evaluation of the individual test batches
Year 3 Test rooting of the first 250 young plants based on the Year 2 trial evaluation
Further protocol adjustments if necessary 
Evaluation of the individual test batches
Year 4 Testing of reproducibility with 1,000 young plants based on the Year 3 trial evaluation
Evaluation of the individual test batches
Further protocol adjustments where necessary
Year 5 Confirmation of reproducibility with 5,000 young plants
Year 6 Re-confirmation of reproducibility with 10,000 young plants
Year 7 Scalable production: > 20,000 young plants

 

Conclusion

he examples given show that in vitro propagation also requires lead times. At the same time, however, it enables precise production planning, high plant quality and the reliable scaling up of new varieties.

Compared with other vegetative propagation methods, the timeframes often differ less significantly than is commonly assumed. What is far more crucial is how well the respective crop is managed in terms of production techniques. Or perhaps we should put it the other way round: if in vitro propagation can cover a very large number of crops, it simply makes the niche production of young plants for many varieties and species much easier. An equally important distinction is that one can start with just a single mother plant and does not first have to focus on large-scale mother plant production.

Frederik Vollert
Frederik Vollert

Frederik Vollert is a trained nursery gardener. After continuing his education to become a horticultural technician and nursery foreman, he was responsible for setting up quality assurance for mother plants and for the development of the product range at Robert Mayer. For the new position of product development he moved within the group of companies to Lubera Edibles GmbH, where he is also responsible for the e-commerce area.

More interesting posts

  • Wie lange werden Pflanzen gekauft?
  • Zangenangriff auf die Wurzelfäule bei Himbeeren
  • Wohin steuert der Tanker? Die Lubera Züchtung 2026-2030
  • Cooltropics® Winterharte Passionsfrüchte: Fortschritte und Ausblick bei der Züchtung von Passiflora incarnata
  • Lubera Chef®: Das Beerenkonzept mit Inhalt, Geschmack und Aroma
Subscribe to gardener's letter

Our newsletter for the gardening professional

Unsubscribe is possible at any time.

Thank you for your interest in the newsletter!

To ensure our newsletter reaches the right recipient, we sent an e-mail to the address provided.

Please confirm by clicking on the link contained therein again that you subscribe to the gardener's letter at this address.

Info
Subscribe to gardener's letter

Our newsletter for the gardening professional

Unsubscribe is possible at any time.

Thank you for your interest in the newsletter!

To ensure our newsletter reaches the right recipient, we sent an e-mail to the address provided.

Please confirm by clicking on the link contained therein again that you subscribe to the gardener's letter at this address.

Service
  • Downloads, Catalogs
  • Contact
  • Jobs
  • Newsletter
Legal
  • Imprint
  • Data protection
  • Conditions